Seems like a great idea to me, even though it costs more to produce paper bags than plastic. But the long-term effects cannot be denied. Those bags in the trees never go away -- they just blow over to your neighbor's tree.
The proposal was approved by a vote on 3-1, with our Councilman Robert Curran as the sole "no" vote. Curran, whom the Baltimore Sun notes "took a job bagging groceries after high school," (see -- he's just common folk like us!) said that he is standing with grocery worker unions who oppose the bill.
I am a fervent supporter of unions, so I understand Curran wanting to do the right thing here. However, I would have much preferred he be more forward-looking and take the approach of Councilwoman Agnes Welch. From the Sun:
City Councilwoman Agnes Welch, meanwhile, voted for the bill in committee so it could be vetted by the full council, she said. But she said she may not support the measure when it comes before the full council.Your thoughts?
Image from "It's our L.A.!"
2 comments:
I do not support this bill. This bill only limits plastic bags at large business' like Walmarts, Targets and large grocery chains and, honestly, how many of those are in Baltimore? The bulk of the bags in Baltimore could be tied to small convienence stores, chinese carry outs, liquor stores, and the like.
If plastic bags are a problem then ban them. But don't selectivly decide who can and cannot use them.
Once again the Baltimore City Council attacks big business, not the core issues that we face.
Well, the idea is that small business would be hurt financially by an outright ban. That's why it only targets the larger businesses.
And there are actually a lot of Giants, Safeways, Mars in the city, so I think it would have a positive effect.
Post a Comment